Research › Search › Judgment

Karnataka High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 584 (KAR)

Murali Krishna Brahmandam v. Chief Electoral Officer

2022-04-22

RITU RAJ AWASTHI, S.SUJATHA

body2022
ORDER 1. The list being revised, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. 2. This Public Interest Litigation has been filed seeking the following reliefs: '1. Direct R-1, R-2, and R-3 to NOT conduct the 2023 Assembly election but to conduct direct election to directly elect representational people's representatives from all political parties as Petitioner will elaborate for the whole Karnataka state area - a move that is needed to make the Karnataka area more equitable to all. 2. Direct all Respondents and political parties to come together and ask the Petitioner to act as the Interim Representative of Karnataka to RESTRUCTURE the Karnataka area government correctly - a need of Karnataka area people and businesses that cannot be fulfilled otherwise.' 3. It appears from the averments made in the writ petition that the petitioner is aggrieved with the Assembly elections held under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short 'the said Act'). There is no challenge to the provisions of the said Act. The averments made in the writ petition do not make out any case for grant of indulgence. The writ petition, being misconceived, is dismissed. 4. The pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and stands disposed of.