JUDGMENT : SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J. 1. Heard Mr. B.R. Lochan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mrs. Priya Shrestha, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Shankar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2. 2. This petition has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the order taking cognizance dated 24.09.2020 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Chaibasa in G.R. Case No. 444/2020 (Kiriburu Mahila P.S. Case No. 01/2020), pending in the court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar at Chaibasa. 3. The opposite party no. 2 Minakshi Mandal has lodged complaint against the petitioner and cognizance has been taken under Section 494/498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against the petitioner. 4. Mr. B.R. Lochan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that compromise has been entered between the parties. He further submits that in terms of the compromise, the petitioner has already paid sum of Rs. 10 Lakhs to opposite party no. 2. He also submits that the bank draft of Rs. 15 Lakhs is ready in the hand of the petitioner, who is present in the Court. He further submits that in terms of the compromise, the remaining amount of Rs. 5 Lakhs shall be paid to opposite party no. 2 by the petitioner after decree of divorce. 5. Mr. Shankar Singh, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2 accepts the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on instruction submits that the opposite party no. 2 has already received the amount of Rs. 10 Lakhs. He further submits that opposite party no. 2 is also present in the Court in person and she is ready to accept the bank draft of Rs. 15 Lakhs. 6. Mr. Shankar Singh, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2 has identified the opposite party no. 2, who is present in the Court. 7. The petitioner and opposite party no. 2 are present in the Court in person and they have accepted the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as opposite party no. 2. 8. The photo copy of bank draft of Rs. 15 Lakhs bearing no. 001122, dated 25.03.2022 has been annexed with the supplementary affidavit, filed on behalf of the petitioner dated 31.03.2022. The bank draft of Rs. 2. 8. The photo copy of bank draft of Rs. 15 Lakhs bearing no. 001122, dated 25.03.2022 has been annexed with the supplementary affidavit, filed on behalf of the petitioner dated 31.03.2022. The bank draft of Rs. 15 Lakhs has been handed over to opposite party no. 2 by the petitioner in presence of the learned counsel for the parties. 9. In view of the above facts and considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and since the petition is arising out of matrimonial dispute and there is no societal interest and in terms of the compromise, the agreement has been fulfilled, to allow this matter to continue will amount to abuse of process of law. 10. In that view of the matter and considering the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Another, (2014) 6 SCC 466 , it is a fit case to exercise power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the entire criminal proceeding including the order taking cognizance dated 24.09.2020 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Chaibasa in G.R. Case No. 444/2020 (Kiriburu Mahila P.S. Case No. 01/2020), pending in the court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar at Chaibasa is, hereby, quashed. 11. Accordingly, this petition stands allowed and disposed of.