ORDER : The present bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been maintained by the petitioner for grant of bail in case FIR No. 421/2021, dated 23.12.2021, under Sections 294, 354-D, 355, 506 of IPC and Section 12 of POCSO Act, registered in Police Station Balh, District Mandi, H.P. 2. As per the averments made in the petition, the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Further, the petitioner is permanent resident of District Mandi and neither in a position to tamper with the prosecution evidence nor in a position to flee from justice. No fruitful purpose will be served by keeping him behind the bars for an unlimited period, so he be released on bail. 3. Police report stands filed. As per the prosecution story, on 23.12.2021, the prosecutrix made a complaint against the petitioner, wherein it has been alleged that she is a student of 10+1 in Hatgarh School, which is at a distance of 3 Kms from her house. She further alleged that last year when schools were closed on account of lockdown, the petitioner used to make calls on her mother’s mobile, compelling the prosecutrix to talk to him, but when mother of the prosecutrix asked the reason for calling her daughter, the petitioner stopped calling. However, when school of the prosecutrix reopened, the petitioner started following the prosecutrix on her way to school and also started harassing her by passing comments. On 23.12.2021, when prosecutrix reached her school around 8:40 A.M., the petitioner asked her friend to tell prosecutrix to come outside the school gate and when prosecutrix alongwith her friend came there, the petitioner caught the prosecutrix from her neck and slapped her. Even, when teachers of the school came outside, the petitioner slapped the prosecutrix twice or thrice. Consequently, FIR No. 421/2021, dated 23.12.2021, under Sections 294, 354-D, 355, 506 of IPC and Section 12 of POCSO Act, came to be registered against the petitioner. On 25.12.2021 the petitioner surrendered himself and he was arrested accordingly. During interrogation the petitioner disclosed that he wants to maintain relation with the prosecutrix and he was afraid that when she will grow up, she will marry another guy and that is why, when she refused to talk to him, he slapped her. On 25.12.2021 the petitioner surrendered himself and he was arrested accordingly. During interrogation the petitioner disclosed that he wants to maintain relation with the prosecutrix and he was afraid that when she will grow up, she will marry another guy and that is why, when she refused to talk to him, he slapped her. Lastly, it is prayed that the bail application of the petitioner be dismissed, as there is possibility that in case at this stage the petitioner is enlarged on bail, he may repeat such offences again and may also threaten the prosecutrix. 4. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Additional Advocate General for the State and gone through the record, including the police report(s), carefully. 5. The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is 26 years of age and neither in a position to tamper with the prosecution evidence nor in a position to flee from justice. He has further argued that the petitioner is behind the bars since his arrest and no fruitful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars for an unlimited period. He has argued that keeping in view the material, which has come on record, and also the age of the petitioner, the bail application be allowed. Conversely, the learned Additional Advocate General has argued that the petitioner is a drug addict and at this stage, in case he is enlarged on bail, he may repeat such offences again and may also threaten the prosecutrix. He has prayed that the bail application of the petitioner be dismissed. 6. At this stage, considering the age of the petitioner, the manner in which the offence is alleged to have occurred, the fact that the petitioner is resident of the place and neither in a position to tamper with the prosecution evidence nor in a position to flee from justice, the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the conditions of bail, if so granted. So, considering the overall facts, which have come on record, and without discussing the same at this stage and also the fact that the petitioner cannot be kept behind the bars for an unlimited period, this Court finds that the present is a fit case where the judicial discretion to admit the petitioner on bail is required to be exercised in his favour. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, who has been arrested by the police, in case FIR No. 421/2021, dated 23.12.2021, under Sections 294, 354-D, 355, 506 of IPC and Section 12 of POCSO Act, shall be released on bail forthwith in this case, subject to his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-(rupees twenty five thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. The bail is granted subject to the following conditions : (i) That the petitioner will appear before the learned Trial Court/Police/authorities as and when required. (ii) That the petitioner will not leave India without prior permission of the Court. (iii) That the petitioner will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Investigating Officer or Court. 7. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of.