JUDGMENT : 1. This intra court appeal is filed challenging the order dtd. 9/2/2022 passed by the learned single Judge whereby while disposing of the writ petition, a direction has been issued to respondent No. 1 to consider the representation dtd. 1/12/2021 submitted by the respondent No. 2-petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with Sec. 322 (2) of Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act 1976 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. 2. The case has been taken on revised list. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant was neither present in the first round nor in the second round to press this writ appeal. 4. From the order sheet, it appears that he was also absent on the last date. It appears that the appellant's counsel is deliberately avoiding the court. 5. We have gone through the impugned order dtd. 9/2/2022 passed in writ petition No. 667/2022 (LB-RES). The court has not decided the writ petition on the rights of the petitioner to claim for demolition of the building in question and has merely provided that the representation of respondent No. 2-petitioner may be considered and decided by respondent No. 1, who is said to be the competent authority in this regard, in accordance with Sec. 322(2) of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act 1976, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. 6. We, therefore, do not find any reason to keep this writ appeal pending unnecessarily. We are of the considered view that it is for the competent authority to consider the question of demolition of the building in question in accordance with law as per his discretion and by giving opportunity to the concerning parties and no direction has been issued by the writ court to pass any such order for demolition. As such, no prejudice is said to have been caused to the appellant. In this view of the matter, we do not find any reason to grant indulgence. 7. Accordingly, the writ appeal being devoid of merits, is dismissed.