JUDGMENT Rajnesh Oswal, J. - Vide order dated 11.11.2021, the petitioner was granted interim bail. 2. Mr. O. P. Thakur, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that there are serious allegations against the petitioner and even statement of the prosecutrix has also been recorded, as such, he submits that interim bail granted to the petitioner be cancelled. 3. Ms. Aarushi Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are no allegations against the petitioner for violating any condition imposed by this Court while granting bail and it shall be travesty of justice if the petitioner who is 75 years of age is sent to the jail, when the statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded. 4. Without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court is of the considered view that the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 11.11.2021 is required to be made absolute particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner is 75 years of age at present and there are no allegations that he has violated any condition imposed by this Court while grating bail. 5. Viewed thus, interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 11.11.2021 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. 6. The respondents shall be at liberty to lay a motion before the learned trial court in the event, there is any violation of the condition by the petitioner imposed by this Court while granting bail. Taking into consideration the long pendency of the trial, learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months. 7. Disposed of.