ORDER : Piyush Agrawal, J. 1. The present intra-Court appeals have been preferred assailing the common judgement & order dated August 27, 2021 passed in leading Writ A No. 6418 of 2021, vide which the writ petitions filed by the appellants against their transfer orders have been dismissed. 2. As the issues involved in these appeals are similar arising out of common judgement and order, hence the same are being decided by the common order. 3. The facts of Special Appeal No. 724 of 2021 are taken for the purpose of deciding these two appeals. 4. The appellant applied for intra-State or inter-District transfer on the strength of Government Order dated December 9, 2019, which was accorded. The application was processed and she was transferred at her requested place. Later on, on scrutiny of documents, it revealed that the disclosed information given by the appellant was incorrect and therefore her transfer order was recalled. The appellant preferred writ petition before this Court, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by the impugned order. 5. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that transfer of the appellant had been sanctioned by the Board of Basic Education and on February 2, 2021, the appellant was relieved from her place of posting in district Chitakoot to join at the transferred place i.e. Rampur vide order dated February 02, 2021. But on May 10, 2021, the appellant was directed to re-join at her original place of posting i.e. district Chitakoot. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant preferred writ petition before this Court, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide impugned order holding that incorrect information was given by the appellant for seeking her inter -district transfer. He prays for allowing the appeal. 6. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel supports the impugned order and prays that the present appeals are liable to be dismissed summarily. He submitted that the appellants herein got the benefit of the policy by furnishing wrong information hence, the order was rightly recalled. 7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, the undisputed fact that emerges is that the appellant was appointed as Assistant Teacher in primary institution. After the issuance of Government Order dated December 2, 2019, appellant submitted application seeking her transfer, which was approved. 7. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, the undisputed fact that emerges is that the appellant was appointed as Assistant Teacher in primary institution. After the issuance of Government Order dated December 2, 2019, appellant submitted application seeking her transfer, which was approved. Subsequently on verification it was revealed that incorrect information was furnished by the appellant for transfer that she belonged to the rural local area cadre while sought her transfer to urban local area cadre. The said inter-change of cadre was not permissible, in the absence of any formal order. Therefore, the appellant was rightly directed to re-join at her original place of posting. 8. The appellant has also failed to bring on record any cogent reason or material to show that her posting was in urban local area cadre instead of rural local area cadre. 9. Learned Senior Counsel, at this juncture, has submitted that the appellant was receiving House Rent Allowance of urban area. Therefore, she should be treated in Urban Local Area Cadre. The appointment letter issued to the appellant is on record, which shows that her appointment was in rural local area cadre. Merely, the residence of appellant for payment of House Rent Allowance for urban local area has no relevance for determining the cadre of the appellant. 10. It is stated at bar that the appellants have joined at their original place of posting. 11. In view of the facts stated above as well as in the absence of any material available on record to show that the appellants belong to urban local area cadre, no case is made out for interference with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. 12. The appeals fail and are accordingly dismissed. 13. There shall be no order as to costs.