ORDER : – Heard finally with the consent of the parties. 2. Regard being to the similitude of prayers and considering the commonality of issues involved in these writ petitions, they were heard analogously and are being disposed of by a common order. For the sake of clarity and convenience, the facts of W.P. No. 7913/2022 are being taken into consideration. 3. The facts reveal that pursuant to Circular dated 25-3-2020 issued by the Directorate of Health Services, Govt. of M.P., Bhopal, Collectors of Districts spread over in the State of M.P. were delegated the power to procure human resources like rapid response teams, doctors/staff nurses/paramedical staff to deal with COVID-19 pandemic. Thereafter, advertisement was issued and pursuant to the advertisement petitioners also applied for appointment and they were also appointed against the posts described in the cause title. Averments further reflect that the petitioners have completed about 2 years in service and now the respondents have issued the Circular, dated 28-3-2022 by which, services of the petitioners have been dispensed with, on the ground of non-availability of budget. The order dated 28-3-2022 issued by the National Health Mission is the subject-matter of challenge in the present bunch of writ petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for petitioners submit that though a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. No. 11096/2022, Ashita Dubey vs. State of M.P. and others, 2021(4) M.P.L.J. 155 wherein challenge was made to the same impugned order dated 28-3-2022, issued by the Director, National Health Mission, has dismissed the writ petition vide order dated 17-5-2022, however, it is strenuously urged that there is another ground which has been raised in the present writ petitions with regard to replacement of one set of contractual employees by another set of contractual employees. 5. In one of the writ petitions of this bunch, it is also contended that the Projects under which they were engaged, are still continuing. Thus, petitioners urge that the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in Ashita Dubey (supra) is distinguishable. 6. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for respondents submit that the entire grounds raised at the instance of the employees have been dealt with by the Co-ordinate Bench in the order passed in Ashita Dubey (supra) against which a writ appeal has been preferred which is pending consideration and no order has been passed therein. 6. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for respondents submit that the entire grounds raised at the instance of the employees have been dealt with by the Co-ordinate Bench in the order passed in Ashita Dubey (supra) against which a writ appeal has been preferred which is pending consideration and no order has been passed therein. The respondents submit that the petitioners shall be given extra 10% marks for their experience in future contractual employment as per Circular dated 24-5-2021 issued by National Health Mission, but they have no right to claim continuity in service. 7. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and bestowed anxious consideration on the arguments advanced by the parties. 8. Before the Co-ordinate Bench a specific ground was raised that one set of employees are being replaced by another set of employees. This contention was dwell upon by the Co-ordinate Bench in Ashita Dubey (supra), which is evident from a bare perusal of the operating paragraph of the order. The Co-ordinate Bench categorically held, that the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate her right to continue on the post and since the appointment of the petitioner was in the form of temporary employment on contract basis, therefore, she has no right to continue on the post and hence, the petition was dismissed. The Co-ordinate Bench upon consideration of entire grounds dismissed the petition including those which are being sought to be agitated herein in this batch of writ petitions. 9. In the considered view of this Court since the Co-ordinate Bench has already dealt with the issue in Ashita Dubey (supra), the stand taken at the instance of employees and the grounds which are being agitated in these writ petitions have also been elaborately taken note of by the Coordinate Bench in Ashita Dubey (supra), this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petitions. 10. Accordingly, the present petitions deserve to and are hereby dismissed without any order as to costs.