Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2022 DIGILAW 887 (SC)

Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Varanasi v. Rakhi Singh

2022-05-19

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, SURYA KANT

body2022
ORDER 1. The proceedings have been mentioned by Mr Vishnu Shankar Jain, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the original plaintiffs, namely, the first to fifth respondents in the proceedings before this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution. 2. Mr Jain states that the learned counsel who has been briefed to appear in these proceedings is indisposed today and, hence, is unable to remain present. He has requested the Court to take up the matter tomorrow. 3. Mr Huzefa A Ahmadi, learned senior counsel, states that there is no objection to the grant of adjournment on account of the personal indisposition of counsel, however, equally, it is necessary that the Trial Court which is continuing to hear the proceedings today may desist from doing so until this Court takes up the proceedings tomorrow. 4. Responding to the above submission, Mr Jain states that the proceedings before the Trial Court shall not be pressed any further hereafter until the Court takes up the matter tomorrow. 5. We accordingly direct the Trial Court to strictly act in terms of the above arrangement and to desist from taking up further proceedings in the suit in view of the consensus which has been arrived at between the parties. 6. List the proceedings tomorrow at 3 pm before this Bench. The Registry may seek the administrative directions of the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India so that the Bench may be constituted.