Research › Search › Judgment

Gujarat High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 91 (GUJ)

Savdasbhai Arjanbhai Chavda v. State of Gujarat

2022-01-18

ALPESH Y.KOGJE

body2022
JUDGMENT : Alpesh Y. Kogje, J. 1. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR No. 11202046200041 of 2020 registered with Panch "B" Division Police Station, Jamnagar for offence under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. 3. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. 4. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order. 5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:- I. The FIR is registered on 24.01.2020 for the offence which is alleged to have taken place between 01.07.2019 to 30.07.2019. II. The applicant is in jail since 20.09.2021. III. The investigation is concluded and charge-sheet is filed. IV. The investigation pertains to a land deal. V. Submission of learned advocate for the applicant that the applicant has not played any major role, but as a broker. VI. The co-accused who are having graver role have been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench. VII. Submission of learned APP that the applicant is has two antecedents, to which learned advocate submits that the antecedents are of 2014 and 2018 and that now the complainant has entered into a settlement with the main accused namely Bharatbhai Bhagvanjibhai Dav. The said copy of the settlement is produced on record. VIII. Learned APP under instructions of IO is unable to bring on record any special circumstances against the applicant. 6. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40. 7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. 8. Hence, the present application is allowed. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. 8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR No. 11202046200041 of 2020 registered with Panch "B" Division Police Station, Jamnagar, on executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week; (d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned; (e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.; (f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court; 9. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. 10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. 11. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. 12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. 13. 11. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. 12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. 13. In view of the order passed in the main matter, the Criminal Misc. Application No. 1 of 2021 does not survive. Hence, disposed of accordingly.