JUDGMENT : 1. This petition has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings including the order dated 04.06.2016 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for the offence under sections 363/370/374/325 of the I.P.C and sections 4/14 of the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 in connection with Ahtu Lohardaga P.S.Case No.05 of 2016, corresponding to G.R.Case No.145/2016, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Lohardaga in S.T.No.88/2016. 2. On the written report of Mr. Karmu Kherwar, the F.I.R was registered alleging therein that his daughter Rajmuni Kherwar who was 10 years of age, was taken by the present petitioners on the pretext of providing her proper education. The present petitioners took the permission of her grandfather. She was brought on 19 February, 2016. The informant further stated that he went twice to the house of the present petitioner to check the whereabouts of her daughter but the petitioner said that he has no information with respect to the girl. On 6th March, 2016, the son of the informant went to the house of the present petitioners and insisted to meet his younger sister and asked her to return home. The petitioners locked the victim in a room and it was further alleged by the informant that the child was not accorded proper behaviour and was not fed properly. Lastly, the informant stated that the victim tried to flee from the premises of the present petitioners on 8th March, 2016 and in the attempt doing so, she got her left leg fractured. 3. Mr. Nilesh Kumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the penalty has already been provided under the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. He submits that when the special Act is there, the I.P.C will not apply and it is well settled law. He further submits that in view of sub section (3) of section 14(D) of the said Act, the case is compoundable. He further submits that section 3 of the said Act provides that once the matter is compounded, no prosecution shall be instituted. On this ground, he submits that the entire criminal proceeding is fit to be quashed. He further submits that in view of sub section (3) of section 14(D) of the said Act, the case is compoundable. He further submits that section 3 of the said Act provides that once the matter is compounded, no prosecution shall be instituted. On this ground, he submits that the entire criminal proceeding is fit to be quashed. He further submits that in terms of order dated 10.3.2016 of the Child Welfare Committee a sum of Rs.20,000/- has been paid to the victim. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the O.P.No.2 submits that it is an admitted fact that Child Welfare Committee at Lohardaga directed by order dated 10.03.2016 to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- to the victim and the same has been paid, however, the F.I.R has been lodged on 12.03.2016 and lodging of the F.I.R is not restricted. 5. In view of the above facts and the submission of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties, it appears that the penalty is provided in section 14 of the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. Since there is special statute, the I.P.C is not attracted which is well settled. Sub section (3) of section 14(D) of the said Act is quoted hereinbelow: 14-D. Compounding of offence-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the District Magistrate may, on the application of the accused person, compound any offence committed for the first time by him, under sub-section (3) of section 14 or any offence committed by an accused person being parent or a guardian, in such manner and on payment of such amount to the appropriate Government, as may be prescribed. (2) xxxxxx xxxxxxx (3) Where any offence is compounded before the institution of any prosecution, no prosecution shall be instituted in relation to such offence, against the offender in relation to whom the offence is so compounded. (4) xxxxx xxxxxx” 6. On perusal of sub-section (3) of section 14(D) of Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, it is crystal clear that when the offence is compounded before the institution of prosecution, no prosecution shall be instituted. (4) xxxxx xxxxxx” 6. On perusal of sub-section (3) of section 14(D) of Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, it is crystal clear that when the offence is compounded before the institution of prosecution, no prosecution shall be instituted. In the case in hand, the Child Welfare Committee has already directed to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- on 10.3.2016 and the F.I.R in question was filed on 12.3.2016 and the amount in question has been paid in view of the direction of the said Committee. The provision under sub section (3) of section 14(D) of the said Act speaks that no prosecution when the matter has already been compounded shall be instituted. 7. Accordingly, the entire criminal proceedings including the order dated 04.06.2016 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioners in connection with Ahtu Lohardaga P.S.Case No.05 of 2016, corresponding to G.R.Case No.145/2016, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II, Lohardaga in S.T.No.88/2016 is quashed. 8. Cr.M.P.No.2074 of 2016 is allowed and disposed of. 9. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. 10. Interlocutory Applications (IAs) stand disposed of.