JUDGMENT 1. This petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.1 under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., for granting anticipatory bail in Crime No.55/2022 registered by Gonibeedu police station, Chikkamagaluru district for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 354(A)(2) and 506 read with Section 18 of POCSO Act. 2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 served and unrepresented. 3. The case of the prosecution is that on the complaint of the mother of the victim-respondent No.2 herein, complaint came to be filed on 04.06.2022 alleging that her daughter aged about 13 years was found dull and on questioning she has revealed that on 04.05.2022 at 12.30 p.m. when her mother and other family members were out of the house and she was alone in the house, at that time this petitioner entered the house and said to have dragged the victim girl by holding hands and when she raised the alarm, he went away by threatening her not to disclose to anybody. After registering the case, the police are making hectic effort to arrest this petitioner. He has approached the Sessions Judge for granting anticipatory bail, which came to be rejected. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated. There is delay of one month in filing the complaint. Therefore, he contends that the present petitioner is entitled for bail and he is ready to abide by any condition. Hence prayed for granting bail. 5. Per contra, learned HCGP objected the bail petition and contended that statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C statement has clearly revealed that the accused not only dragged the victim but touched her body and private parts and the victim herself raised alarm and thereafter the petitioner ran away by threatening her not to disclose. Therefore, there is a delay in lodging the complaint. Petitioner is required for custodial interrogation, hence prayed for rejecting the bail petition. 6. Upon hearing the arguments and perused the records, which reveals ofcourse, there is a delay of one month in filing the complaint. The alleged incident said to be have taken place on 04.05.2022 at 12.30 p.m., whereas complaint came to be filed on 04.06.2022 at 12.30 p.m., hence, one month delay in lodging the complaint. 6. Upon hearing the arguments and perused the records, which reveals ofcourse, there is a delay of one month in filing the complaint. The alleged incident said to be have taken place on 04.05.2022 at 12.30 p.m., whereas complaint came to be filed on 04.06.2022 at 12.30 p.m., hence, one month delay in lodging the complaint. The statement of the mother of the victim reveals the accused only dragged the victim girl by holding her hands, however, victim girl stated that the accused dragged her and also hugged her and touched her chest, thereafter when she raised alarm, the accused went away by threatening her. The offence under Section 7 of POCSO may also be attracted other than 354 A of IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act. However, the medical report of the victim is not produced before this Court, except the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. There is improvement in the 164 Cr.P.C statement and 154 Cr.P.C statement of the mother of the victim. The alleged offences are though non-bailable, but not punishable with death or imprisonment of life and triable by the Magistrate. Therefore, considering the delay in lodging the complaint and by imposing certain conditions, if bail is granted, no prejudice would be caused to the case of the prosecution. The alleged offences are though non-bailable, but not punishable with death or imprisonment of life and triable by the Magistrate. Therefore, considering the delay in lodging the complaint and by imposing certain conditions, if bail is granted, no prejudice would be caused to the case of the prosecution. Hence, the following ORDER The respondent - Police is directed to release the petitioner/accused No.1 on bail in the event of his arrest for the offences punishable under Sections Crime No.55/2022 registered by Gonibeedu police station, Chikkamagaluru district for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 354(A)(2) and 506 read with Section 18 of POCSO Act, subject to the following conditions: (i) Petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees One Lakhs only) with a solvent surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer or the concerned trial Court; (ii) Petitioner shall surrender himself before the Investigating Officer within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order; (iii) Petitioner shall not directly or indirectly tamper with any of the prosecution witnesses; (iv) Petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offences; (v) Petitioner shall be deemed custody for the purpose of any recovery under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; (vi) Petitioner shall mark his attendance before the Investigating Officer between 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m. on every Monday for a period of two months or till filing of charge-sheet whichever is earlier.