ORDER : [1] I. A. NOS. 37666, 37670 AND 37679/2020 1. Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks. 2. List these applications after four weeks. [2] I. A. NOS. 196062 AND 174896/2019 1. On 18.05.2023, this Court passed the following order:- “On the last date when the matter was heard, a suggestion was made by the Bench that instead of the CEC (Central Empowered Committee) being an ad-hoc body, it would be in the larger interest that the CEC as an institution should be a permanent statutory body. Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General, has accepted the said suggestion. He states that the Union of India would publish a draft notification under the provisions of Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 providing for the constitution of the CEC. He submitted that the draft notification would contain 8 provisions related to the qualification of the Members to be appointed, their tenure, their powers and responsibilities etc. Learned Solicitor General submits that the draft notification will be published within a period of 15 days from today and that the same shall be placed before the Court on the next date.” 2. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General of India, has handed over a draft notification to be issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) regarding constitution of Central Empowered Committee (CEC). The said draft has already been shared with Mr. K. Parameshwar, learned Amicus Curiae. 3. Learned Amicus Curiae submits that he has only one suggestion to the draft notification i.e. there should be a provision for periodical audit of the functioning of the CEC by the MoEFCC. 4. Learned Solicitor General does not have any objection to the said suggestion. He states that the suggestion given by the learned Amicus Curiae would be incorporated in the final notification that would be issued by the MoEFCC. 5. We, therefore, permit the Union of India to proceed further with the issuance of notification for constitution of the CEC as a permanent body. 6. We find that rather than CEC functioning as an ad hoc body, it functioning as a permanent body would be in the interest of all the stake holders. 7. We also permit the MoEFCC to proceed further with the constitution of the CEC in accordance with the notification that will be issued by the MoEFCC. 6. We find that rather than CEC functioning as an ad hoc body, it functioning as a permanent body would be in the interest of all the stake holders. 7. We also permit the MoEFCC to proceed further with the constitution of the CEC in accordance with the notification that will be issued by the MoEFCC. [3] INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 44942/2019 1. In pursuance to the judgment passed by this Court on 12.12.1996 [T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1997) 2 SCC 267 ], the State of Karnataka has submitted that it has constituted an Expert Committee. 2. In the affidavit, it is further stated that as per the report of the Committee an area ad measuring 3,30,186.93 hectares has been identified as deemed forest and the same has also been approved by the State Government. 3. The said compliance is taken on record. 4. The application stands disposed of. [4] I. A. NOS. 87544, 87550 AND 91723 OF 2023 [5] I. A. NOS. 107906 AND 107909/2023 [6] I. A. NOS. 115479, 115480 AND 115482/2023 1. As prayed, four weeks’ time is granted for filing reply affidavit. 2. List after four weeks. I.A. NO.1412/2005 AND I.A. No.117831/2019 These applications were mentioned before the Court. List these applications on 13.09.2023.