Research › Search › Judgment

Delhi High Court · body

2023 DIGILAW 1189 (DEL)

Ram Prakash v. Union of India

2023-02-23

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, SURESH KUMAR KAIT

body2023
JUDGMENT (Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, petitioner is seeking quashing of letter dated 21.12.2021 issued by the respondents whereby the request of petitioner for grant of pro rata pension was rejected and directions to the respondents to grant pro rata pension to the petitioner from the date of his discharge i.e., 09.04.2013, along with all consequential benefits in terms of judgment dated 24.11.2020 passed by this Court in W.P. (C) No.98/2020 as well as other judgments passed by this Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court. 2. Notice issued. 3. Learned counsel for respondents accepts notice and has fairly conceded that the case of the petitioner shall be considered as per Policy dated 04.11.2022 if he is found eligible. 4. In view of above, we hereby direct the respondents to consider the case of petitioner in terms of Policy dated 04.11.2022 if petitioner is found eligible and take a final decision within six weeks from today and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner within one week thereafter with reasoned order. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of. 6. Pending application also stands disposed of. 7. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, he may approach the appropriate forum.