Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2023 DIGILAW 1369 (RAJ)

Kamal S/o Tara Chand v. State Of Rajasthan-State, Through PP

2023-07-13

KULDEEP MATHUR

body2023
JUDGMENT : The instant appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed by the appellants against the order dated 13.4.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Merta, District Nagaur in Cr. Case No.57/2023, whereby the bail application filed by the appellants, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.437/2022 registered at Police Station Kuchaman City, District Nagaur, for offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 302, 109, 120 of IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants have been falsely implicated in the present case. Drawing attention of the Court towards the statements of eyewitnesses namely Amba Lal and Vinay Kumar, learned counsel submitted that aforementioned witnesses in their statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. have clearly denied the presence of the present appellants in the Bolero which was ran over the deceased by the co-accused persons. Learned counsel submitted that the eye-witnesses of the incident have clearly stated that the appellants were only standing at the place of incident. Learned counsel submitted that in view of the fact that the appellants were not sitting in the offending vehicle, the appellants deserve to be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned counsel submitted that the appellants are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellants. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the appeal. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that presence of the present appellants in the offending vehicle prima facie could not be established on the basis of the statements of the eye witnesses though, the appellants have been named in the FIR by the complainant. 5. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. 6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case and so also the statements of the eye witnesses namely Amba Lal and Vinay Kumar recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. before the competent criminal court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the appellants on bail. 7. 6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case and so also the statements of the eye witnesses namely Amba Lal and Vinay Kumar recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. before the competent criminal court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the appellants on bail. 7. Accordingly, the appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is allowed. The order dated 13.4.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Merta, District Nagaur in Cr. Case No.57/2023 is set aside and it is ordered that the accused-appellants-Kamal S/o Tara Chand and Rahul @ Bhunvesh S/o Dinesh Kumawat shall be enlarged on bail in connection with FIR No.437/2022 registered at Police Station Kuchaman City, District Nagaur, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to so. 8. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of the instant appeal. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.