ORDER : 1. Delay condoned. 2. Heard Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. The counsel would submit that the concerned bank account was frozen by the police on 10.03.2015 and therefore the petitioner should not face conviction for the offence, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881. 4. However, it is seen from the impugned judgment itself that although ten cheques totaling a sum of Rupees Eighty Lakhs was issued by the petitioner, at the relevant point of time, the concerned bank account had maximum deposit of Rs. 18,52,033/-. This would indicate that the benefit of the judgment relied upon by the petitioner to point out his incapacity in operating the bank account, will not aid the petitioner. 5. The Senior Counsel would then refer to the funds available with the petitioner in different bank accounts, as shown from Annexure P-12, to say that the petitioner had sufficient balance in those bank accounts. 6. In a proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the accused cannot rely upon other bank accounts for the dishonoured cheque which relates to specific bank account of the accused. Accordingly, the argument advanced by Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Senior Counsel of having adequate funds by reference to the other bank accounts of the company, cannot be of any assistance to the accused. The Special Leave Petition is therefore found devoid of merit and the same is dismissed. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand closed.