Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2023 DIGILAW 166 (RAJ)

Imran v. State of Rajasthan

2023-01-13

MADAN GOPAL VYAS

body2023
JUDGMENT Madan Gopal Vyas, J. - The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.589/2022 of Police Station Nohar, Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 5. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners, (1) Rahul S/o Bhagta Ram Saini, and (2) Imran S/o Hasan Khan shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.589/2022 of Police Station Nohar, Hanumangarh provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.