Research › Search › Judgment

Delhi High Court · body

2023 DIGILAW 1757 (DEL)

Ex. Ct/dvr Raj Singh v. Union of India

2023-03-21

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, SURESH KUMAR KAIT

body2023
JUDGMENT (Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs: "a.) Quash and set aside the Impugned order dated 16/12/2022 declaring as unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory and against the judicial pronouncements on the subject; b.) Direct Respondents the competent authority to Re-Consider the claim of the petitioner sympathetically and on humanitarian grounds under Rule-41 of CCS(Pension) Rules for grant compassionate allowances i.e. pension and gratuity wef from the date of his Dismissal from service i.e. 23/08/2003 in view of the Judicial pronouncements on the subject and the petitioner may be entitled for his pension and gratuity with arrears; c.) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ/directions/orders as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; d.) Award cost." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Prayer B made in the present petition, the present petition may be treated as a representation. 3. Accordingly, in view of the Prayer B made in the present petition, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the present petition as a representation and take a final decision on the same within eight weeks from today. 4. The decision, so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioner with a reasoned order within one week thereafter. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.