JUDGMENT : 1. Heard Sri Alok Kumar Sharma holding brief of Sri Chandra Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vibhov Ojha, learned A.G.A for the State respondents. 2. The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 26.06.2023 registered as Case Crime No. 190 of 2023 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Nagar, District Basti. Further prayer has been made not to arrest the petitioner in the aforesaid case. 3. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a bright student and he has no connection with Ajeet Kumar, who was found to be appearing in the examination. Submission is that he has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has not committed any offence as alleged. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer for quashing of the FIR and submits that one Ajeet Kumar was arrested on the spot, who was found to be appearing in the examination in place of the petitioner and therefore, a cognizable offence is made out. 5. Perusal of the impugned first information report prima facie reveals commission of cognizable offence. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and Others vs. Bhajan Lal and Others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2021 SC 1918 and in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 3262/2021 (Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati and Another vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh) decided on 07.10.2021, no case has been made out for interference with the impugned first information report. 6. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open for the petitioner to apply before the competent court for anticipatory bail/bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law.