JUDGMENT : [Manish Mathur, J.] 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 to 6 and Mr. Mohan Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.7. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.1 stands dispensed with. 2. Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to court concerned for expeditious disposal of Application for temporary injunction pending in Original Suit No.847 of 2022 filed by petitioner for permanent injunction. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was allotted lease/licence over the property in question which is being interfered with by the defendants due to which several trees in the disputed property has already been felled. As such, temporary injunction is required to be granted in order to preserve the suit property. 4. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties and upon perusal of material on record, it appears that aforesaid suit has been filed in which application for temporary injunction is pending since year 2022. It however does not appear as to whether the defendants have put in appearance or filed their objection or not. 5. In view of aforesaid, the Civil Judge (S. D.), Court No. 15, Sultanpur is directed to decide Application for Temporary Injunction dated 27.09.2022 pending in Original Suit No.847 of 2022 (Nankau and other v. State of U.P. and others) expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date notices are served upon the defendants. 6. Benefit of this order shall be available to petitioner only in case he cooperates in early disposal of the proceedings. 7. With aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.