Research › Search › Judgment

Andhra High Court · body

2023 DIGILAW 431 (AP)

P. v. Jagannadh VS State of A. P.

2023-02-21

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

body2023
JUDGMENT 1. This Writ Petition for a mandamus is filed to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 to 5 in not taking any action against unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 for illegally constructing building in the land covered by Sy.No.177/2A3 of Penukonda Mandal, Ananthapur District, without any building permission, as illegal and contrary to Ss. 204 and 211 of the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965, (for short "the Act") and consequently sought direction to respondent Nos.2 to 5 to initiate appropriate legal proceedings against unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 in this regard. 2. As per the case pleaded by the petitioner, he is the owner of the land in an extent of Ac.3.83 cents covered by Sy.No.177 of Penukonda Village in Ananthapur District. Land in an extent of Ac.1.78 cents was acquired by the Government for public purpose within the said total extent of Ac.3.83 cents. After alienating part of the said property, the land in an extent of 72 Sq. Yds still remains in the name of the petitioner and he is the absolute owner of the same. It is stated that respondent Nos.6 to 8 unauthorizedly encroached on to the said land and started making construction of house in the said land. So, the petitioner has complained the same to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 stating that unofficial respondent Nos. 6 to 8 have been making construction of house without obtaining prior building permission and thereby to take action against them. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that no action has been initiated on the said complaint even though the construction of house is being made contrary to Ss. 204 and 211 of the Act. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court by way of filing this Writ Petition seeking the aforesaid reliefs. 3. Respondent No.1 filed counter stating that dispute inter se the petitioner and the unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 is relating to title of the property. However, as regards the construction of house by unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 is concerned, it is admitted that they did not obtain any building permission and the house is constructed without any building permission. So, it is stated that notice under Sec. 228(1 & 2) of the Act was earlier issued to unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8. 4. However, as regards the construction of house by unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 is concerned, it is admitted that they did not obtain any building permission and the house is constructed without any building permission. So, it is stated that notice under Sec. 228(1 & 2) of the Act was earlier issued to unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8. 4. Respondent No.4 also filed counter stating that it is for the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action which is a local body and respondent No.4 has nothing to do with the grievance of the petitioner. 5. Unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 did not file any counter. 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration appearing for respondent No.1, Sri N. Ranga Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.3 and 4. 7. As can be seen from the pleadings of both the parties, there is a dispute relating to title in respect of the land in question between the petitioner and unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8. The petitioner claims that he is the absolute owner of the land in question and that unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 have illegally occupied the same and constructing a house on it. The unofficial respondents did not file any counter asserting their title to the property. But it is a fact that they are constructing a house in the said land. Therefore, the said dispute relating to title of the property between the petitioner and unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 has to be worked out in the competent civil Court including recovery of possession of the property, if any, by the petitioner. 8. However, the issue that needs to be addressed in this Writ Petition is that as per the case pleaded by the petitioner, unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 have been constructing a house in the said site without obtaining any prior building permission from respondent No.2 as required under law and as such it is an illegal construction and respondent No.2 has to take appropriate steps for demolition of the said house which is being constructed without building permission. It is relevant to note here that it is categorically admitted by respondent No.1 in the counter that unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 have been constructing the house without any prior building permission. It is relevant to note here that it is categorically admitted by respondent No.1 in the counter that unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 have been constructing the house without any prior building permission. Even unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 did not file any counter stating that they obtained any building permission for constructing the said house. Therefore, undoubtedly the construction of the house by unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 in the site in question is an unauthorized construction which is being made without prior building permission. It is stated in the counter filed by respondent No.1 that a notice under Sec. 228 (1 and 2) of the Act was also issued to the unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8. It was issued long back but no further action is taken in this regard. Thus, there is dereliction of duty on the part of respondent No.2 in not taking action against unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 in constructing the house without building permission. 9. Therefore, in the said facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take appropriate legal action against unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 for constructing the house in question without obtaining building permission as contemplated under law. Respondent No.2 is directed to issue fresh notice in this regard to the unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 8 as per law and then take further action in this regard by following due process of law. The said exercise of giving notice and taking further action in this regard as directed supra shall be completed within six weeks from the date of this order. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed.