Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DIGILAW 469 (GAU)

Zoramthari v. Directorate of Enforcement

2023-04-27

NELSON SAILO

body2023
JUDGMENT : NELSON SAILO, J. 1. Heard Mr. Prashant Jain, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Also heard Mr. H. Zodinsanga, learned counsel for respondent No. 7. None appears for the remaining respondents despite notice. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the Confirmation Order dated 22.08.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (Act of 2002). According to the petitioners, the Confirmation Order has to be passed by the Adjudicating Authority beyond the period of 180 days in violation of the stipulation in Section 20(1) of the Act of 2002. 3. The petitioners contend that since the Bank Accounts of the petitioners were frozen by Freezing Orders dated 09.02.2022 and 10.02.2022 and thereafter, the authority having submitted the original application to the Adjudicating Authority in terms of Section 17(4) of the Act of 2002, the same ought to have been confirmed or otherwise within the stipulated time of 180 days. As per the Adjudicating Authority itself in its Confirmation Order, the limitation period of passing the order expired on 07.08.2022 and therefore, the adjudicating authority, having become functus officio could not have passed the Confirmation Order dated 22.08.2022. 4. The details of the Bank Accounts of the petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) No. 4/2022 is as follows: S. No. Bank Name A/C Holder Name A/C Number 1. Mizoram Rural Bank (respondent No. 4) Zoramthari 97004421470 2. Mizoram Rural Bank (respondent No. 4) Thari Enterprises 97005917840 3. IndusInd Bank (respondent No. 5) Zoramthari 100007593687 4. IndusInd Bank (respondent No. 5) Thari Enterprises 259862687062 5. IDBI Bank (respondent No. 6) Thari Enterprises 159104000070391 6. HDFC Bank (respondent No. 7) Thari Enterprises 50200044008832 5. The details of the Bank Accounts of the petitioner in W.P. (Crl.) No. 5/2022 is as follows: S. No. Bank Name A/C Holder Name A/C Number 1. Mizoram Rural Bank (respondent No. 4) Lalrinhlua 97007890438 2. Mizoram Rural Bank (respondent No. 4) LRH Enterprises 97012014283 6. The above issue raised in the present 2 (two) writ petitions have been considered in W.P. (Crl.) No. 2/2022 and W.P. (Crl.) No. 3/2022. This Court in taking up the issue as Issue No. 2 has decided that the Confirmation Order, having been passed beyond the stipulated period of 180 days, the same is not sustainable in law. The above issue raised in the present 2 (two) writ petitions have been considered in W.P. (Crl.) No. 2/2022 and W.P. (Crl.) No. 3/2022. This Court in taking up the issue as Issue No. 2 has decided that the Confirmation Order, having been passed beyond the stipulated period of 180 days, the same is not sustainable in law. Further, the extension of limitation period as provided for by the Supreme Court of India in Suo Moto W.P. (C) No. 3/2020 will not apply to the present case for extension of the limitation period for passing the Confirmation Order under the Act of 2002. Since the issue has already been decided, the Judgment and Order dated 27.04.2023 passed in W.P. (Crl.) No. 2/2022 and W.P. (Crl.) No. 3/2022 shall cover the present case as well. Accordingly, the impugned Freezing Order and the Confirmation Order in so far as the Bank Accounts of the petitioners as mentioned in the preceding paragraphs are concerned are hereby set aside. 7. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of as allowed. No cost.