ORDER : The Criminal Appeal is not numbered since the Registry noted that the appeal is preferred beyond the period of six months stipulated in the second proviso to Section 14A(3) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (In short 'the Act') . 2. The learned Counsel for the appellant contended that the prohibition in the second proviso to Section 14A(3) creates a fetter on the right guaranteed to victims, under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. 3. Adv. Amal Dharsan, learned Amicus Curiae referred to the Full Bench decision of the Allahabad High Court in Re: Provision of S.14(a) of SC/ST(Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act,2015(2018 KHC 5250) to point out that the second Proviso to Section 14A (3) has been struck down, declaring the provision to be violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. It is contended that the provision having been struck down by the High Court, it has effect through out the territory of India. To buttress the argument, reliance is placed on the decision in Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd. v. Union of India & Another ( 2004 (6) SCC 254 ). 4. A reading of the Allahabad High Court judgment shows that the Full Bench had considered the question in extenso, before upholding the challenge. As rightly pointed out by the Amicus Curiae, once a statutory provision is struck down by a High Court, it has effect through out the territory of India. Being so, the Registry cannot refuse to number the appeal by relying on the second proviso to Section 14A(3) of the Act. Hence, the objection is overruled and the Registry is directed to number the appeal. I place on record my appreciation for the valuable help rendered by the Amicus Curiae.