JUDGMENT : Jyotsna Sharma, J. 1. Heard Sri Dhiraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri O.P. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the papers on record. 2. This application has been moved on behalf of the applicant- Rizwan Malik and Sandeep Pundeer seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.468 of 2018, under Section 2/3 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act and Section 414 I.P.C., P.S. Sarsawa, District Saharanpur. 3. After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant. 5. In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within 15 days from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same shall be decided strictly according to law. 6. For the period of 15 days from today or till the time of appearance of the applicants before the court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the above case. 7. With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.