JUDGMENT : VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State. 2. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner for the following principal reliefs: “(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents, mainly respondents no. 1 to ensure the payment of al the retiral dues of petitioner in reasonable period. (a) Amount of gratuity of Rs. 800,9,76/- (b) Amount of G.P.F. of Rs. 12,87,427/- (c) Amount of leave encashment of Rs. 4,65,870/- (d) Amount of arrear of D.A. and arrear of pension (e) Interest of 9% from 31.12.2022 to actual payment of abovementioned dues.” 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. 4. Learned standing counsel has no objection to the same. 5. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no. 3 Executive Engineer Construction Division U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural), Mau, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexure and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. 6. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no. 3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. 7. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.