ORDER 1. Upon being mentioned, taken on board. 2. Ms Vrinda Grover, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that a limited relief is sought in these proceedings under Article 32 of the Constitution, namely, that a disclaimer should be made in the title of the film to the effect that it is a work of fiction. 3. Mr Harish Salve, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the fourth respondent, with Mr Ameet Naik, is not agreeable to the suggestion of the petitioner in regard to the introduction of a disclaimer. 4. The relief which has been sought under Article 32 can well be pursued in appropriate proceedings before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. Hence, we are not inclined to entertain the petition on that ground, but, leave it open to the petitioner to move the appropriate High Court. 5. In the event that the High Court is moved and since it is stated that the film is stated to be due for release on 5 May 2023, the High Court may consider the request for early listing. 6. The petition is disposed of. 7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.