Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2023 DIGILAW 7 (RAJ)

Aruna Purohit v. State of Rajasthan

2023-01-02

MANOJ KUMAR GARG

body2023
JUDGMENT Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.437/2019 lodged at Police Station Udaimandir, District Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that compromise has arrived between the parties and petitioners have already joined the investigation. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioners behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioners may be released on anticipatory bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but learned counsel for the complainant concurs the fact of compromise.. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 5. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners (1) Aruna Purohit W/o Late Sh. Anand Kishore Purohit, (2) Amit Purohit S/o Late Sh. Anand Kishore Purohit & (3) Ankit Purohit S/o Late Sh. Anand Kishore Purohit, in connection with FIR No.437/2019 lodged at Police Station Udaimandir, District Jodhpur, the petitioners shall be released on bail; provided they furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.