Avinash Kumar v. High Court of Judicature at Patna through Its Registrar General
2023-07-13
D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, HRISHIKESH ROY, MANOJ MISRA, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, PANKAJ MITHAL
body2023
DigiLaw.ai
ORDER : 1. The petitioner did not qualify in the selection process for district judges through direct recruitment in 2015-2016. However, it is common ground that he has since qualified and joined service in the subsequent batch of 2017. 2. There was no provision for re-evaluation of the answer sheets at the relevant time. 3. In view of the fact that the petitioner has joined service after being successful in a subsequent batch, no case for the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 32 is made out. 4. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. 5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.