Malti Devi v. U. P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Its Managing Director Lko.
2023-04-12
ALOK MATHUR
body2023
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : 1. Heard Smt. Savita Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel appearing for respondents. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that husband of the petitioner died while working on a class IV post under the opposite parties but have not been paid post retiral dues. 3. Shri Rishabh Kapoor, learned Counsel for opposite parties submits that the regularization of the petitioner with retrospective effect was cancelled, however, learned counsel for the petitioner says that irrespective of it, he is entitled to pension and post retiral benefits. 4. Be that as it may, let the appointing authority or whosoever is competent in this regard verify the facts as also the entitlement of the petitioner to the post retiral dues claimed in the light of the relevant rules and Government Order, if any, which may be applicable and take a considered decision in this regard within a period of one month from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. If the petitioner is found entitled to any dues, the same shall be released in his favour within the next 6 weeks. As regards claim of interest on delayed payment of post retiral dues, if any, the same shall be considered in the light of relevant rules or government orders as may be applicable. 5. The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.