JUDGMENT : N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J. Heard Mr. S. Zaman, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. U. Das, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent no. 1& 6 and Mr. R. Dhar, learned Standing Counsel for the Handloom and Textile Department representing the respondent no. 2 as well as Mr. A. Jahid, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no. 3 to 5. 2. The claim of the petitioner is that his employer i.e. respondent Nos. 3 to 5 owes him an amount of Rs. 7,58,727/- against the outstanding salary and gratuity. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has been pursuing with the respondent authorities for payment of such due, however, the respondents have failed to honour his due. 3. The respondents have filed an affidavit wherein a specific stand has been taken that total outstanding due to the petitioner is Rs. 7,58,727/-against pending salary and gratuity Rs. 75,000/- only. However, it was further contended that on account of financial constrain as faced by ARTFED, the authority is not in a position to pay the said amount to the petitioner and only after receipt of grant-in-aid from the Govt. of Assam, the payment of said amount can be made by the ARTFED authorities. Accordingly, the dues as claimed by the petitioner, herein, are admitted by the respondent authorities. 4. This court is of the view that instrumentality of the State like ARTFED cannot take financial constraint as a ground to deny the right of an employee to get his admitted dues, including arrears of salaries. 5. At this stage, the learned standing counsel for the ARTFED submits that funds are to be received from the Government for meeting the existing liabilities towards salaries and pensionary benefits of its employees, including retired employees like the petitioner, herein. The said submission has been duly considered and this Court is of the view that the same does not merit acceptance. The authorities of ARTFED are duty bound to make provisions for releasing to the petitioner, herein, his admitted dues. 6. Considering the above submission and the specific stand of the respondents taken in the affidavit as discussed hereinabove, this court is of the view that the petitioner has been able to make out a case for direction to the respondents to pay the outstanding admitted due amounting to Rs.7,58,727/- to the petitioner. 7. 6. Considering the above submission and the specific stand of the respondents taken in the affidavit as discussed hereinabove, this court is of the view that the petitioner has been able to make out a case for direction to the respondents to pay the outstanding admitted due amounting to Rs.7,58,727/- to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, it is directed that the respondent Nos. 3 to 5, shall do the needful for payment to the petitioner amounting to Rs. 7,58,727/-within a period of 6(six) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The respondents may also pay the aforesaid amount in installments to the petitioner within the period fixed as above. In the event the said amount is not released to the petitioner in full within a period of 6(six) months, w.e.f. the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, the amount so remaining due as on such date shall carry interest @ 6% per annum, w.e.f. the date the amount was due for payment, till the date of its actual payment. 8. With the aforesaid, the present writ petition stands disposed of.