ORDER : 1. The respondents were convicted by the trial court for murder of the husband of the complainant. In appeal, the High Court reversed the decision of the trial court and acquitted them. The complainant is now in appeal, questioning such acquittal recorded by the High Court vide its judgment and order dated 28th September, 2011. 2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant-complainant as well as the respondents-accused. 3. We have also been taken through the evidence of PW-12, the doctor who conducted post-mortem. 4. The incident dates back to 25th December, 1987. The F.I.R. was lodged on the following day. The trial court did not find the charge under section 27, Arms Act proved against the respondents. The State did not prefer any appeal challenging such a finding. 5. The High Court disbelieved the evidence of the prosecution witnesses. 6. Having perused the materials placed on record, the view taken by the High Court appears to be plausible on facts and in the circumstances. We are, thus, not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. 7. The criminal appeals stand dismissed.