S. Kumaresan v. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government Finance (PC), Department
2024-06-14
C.KUMARAPPAN, S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
body2024
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : S.M. Subramaniam, J. [PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order passed in W.P.No.29853 of 2015 dated 21.12.2020.] The Registry, High Court has raised objection and listed the matter under the caption "for maintainability" on the ground that the writ petition was instituted by 42 petitioners. However, the writ appeal has shown only four petitioners in the cause title. Therefore, the Registry returned the papers by stating that the appellants should implead all the writ petitioners, since it is a common order passed by the learned Single Judge, which is under challenge in the writ appeal. The Registry bundle was mis-placed and reconstructed and posted before this Court. The objection raised by the Registry is in consonance with the procedures and there is no infirmity. 2. Thus, we confirm the objection raised by the Registry. Consequently, the writ appeal in W.A.Sr.No.101121 of 2021 stands rejected. It is for the appellant to comply with the defects, if any and represent the same or file a petition afresh.