ORDER : Dipankar Datta, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ. We have carefully gone through the defective 1 [See Office Report dated 25.11.2024.] review petition(s) and connected papers. 2. By means of the instant petition(s), the original appellant seeks review of the Judgment dated 28.08.2024 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Judgment’) rendered in Civil Appeals No.9059-9061 of 2022 2 [ 2024 INSC 659 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2413]. The Civil Appeals were allowed in part. 3. We have reminded ourselves of the width and amplitude of review jurisdiction, as noted in A S Raghavendra v Bharti Airtel Limited, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3121. 4. Having perused the (i) Judgment, (ii) the grounds urged in the review, and; (iii) the grounds urged in the Civil Appeals, on a comparison, we find that the grounds urged in review are identical to the grounds urged in support of the Civil Appeals. In this eventuate, it is clear that all points taken to press the Civil Appeals have been considered in the Judgment. The same cannot be re-agitated herein. 5. In this view of the matter, no case for review is made out. Accordingly, these petitions stand dismissed.