JUDGMENT : [Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 11.06.2024 in W.P.(MD) No.12209 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition. This Writ Appeal has been directed against the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.12209 of 2024 dated 11.06.2024. 2. The present appellant was the second respondent in a writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.12209 of 2024, where the first respondent stood as a writ petitioner, who filed the said writ petition seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent therein who is the second respondent herein ie., the District Registrar (Societies) of Theni District, to nominate and depute an observer under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, to be present and to oversee the proceedings of the extraordinary general meeting of the Bodinayakkanur Nadar Uravinmurai Society (Reg. No.115/2013) to be conducted on 23.06.2024. 3. Learned Writ Court having considered the said prayer submitted by the writ petitioner had directed the District Registrar to consider the representation given by the writ petitioner and pass orders within seven [7] days. With this direction, the order was passed by the learned Judge on 11.06.2024, in the said writ petition which is impugned herein. 4. However, today when the case is taken up for admission as an urgently mentioned case, it is brought to our notice by the learned Counsel appearing for the first respondent that pursuant to the order passed by the Writ Court, the representation of the writ petitioner/first respondent having been considered was rejected by the proceedings issued by the District Registrar dated 19.06.2024 and he has produced the said communication also before this Court by way of a typed set of documents. 5. Having regard to the said factor that the request of the writ petitioner/first respondent itself having been considered and rejected, the present appellant may not have any grievance even against the order that was passed by the writ court in the writ petition. This position is not controverted by the learned counsel for the appellant. 6. Therefore, recording the aforesaid development, as no more adjudication is required in this appeal, the present appeal is liable to be dismissed. 7. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.