JUDGMENT : VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Mohd. Yasir, Advocate holding brief of Sri Imraj Ahmad, counsel for the opposite party no. 2. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case Crime No. 189 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 307 I.P.C., P.S. Baghpat, District Baghpat, pending in the court of C.J.M., District Baghpat, on the basis of compromise between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the dispute between the parties is purely civil and private in nature. In the alleged incident no person received any injury. No medical report is available on the case diary. It is further submitted that during the pendency of the proceedings the parties have reconciled their differences and a compromise has been entered between them. In this regard, copy of the affidavit of the opposite party no. 2 has been annexed as Annexure-3 to the affidavit wherein it is stated that he does not want to press the case. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings before the trial court and the same is not only sheer wastage of time of the Court but also abuse of process of law. 4. Counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the submissions advanced by the counsel for the applicant or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. 5. Learned A.G.A., however, submits that it is the trial court, which has to verify the fact as to whether the parties have entered into compromise, hence the applicant may approach the trial court and move an application with respect to compromise between the parties, which will be decided in accordance with law. 6. In view of above, both the parties are directed to appear before the trial court along with compromise deed as well certified copy of this order within three weeks from today. It is expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the compromise and after ensuring the presence of the parties, pass an appropriate order with respect to the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. While passing the order verifying the compromise, the trial court shall also record the statements of the parties as to whether all the terms and conditions mentioned in the original compromise deed, so filed, have been fulfilled or not. 7. The Court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. Till verification of compromise between the parties by the trial court no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of.