Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2024 DIGILAW 1421 (ALL)

Rahul Raidas v. State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko.

2024-05-25

PANKAJ BHATIA

body2024
JUDGMENT : Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.63 of 2024 under section 2/3 Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Madhoganj, District Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that four cases have been shown in the Gang Chart and in all the cases, the applicant has been granted bail. The co-accused has also been enlarged on bail. The applicant is in jail since 26.12.2023. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact. 5. Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases shown against him, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Rahul Raidas be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.