Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DIGILAW 1515 (MAD)

P. Perumal v. Government of Tamil Nadu

2024-07-05

N.SENTHILKUMAR, S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

body2024
JUDGMENT : [Judgment was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] Prayer in WA.No.1669/2013: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow this writ appeal, set aside order dated 27.11.2012 in W.P.No.1664 of 2011. Prayer in WA.No.1670/2013: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow this writ appeal, set aside order dated 27.11.2012 in W.P.No.1385 of 2011. Prayer in WA.No.1672/2013: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow this writ appeal, set aside order dated 27.11.2012 in W.P.No.1665 of 2011. Prayer in WA.No.1699/2013: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow this writ appeal, set aside order dated 27.11.2012 in W.P.No.3199 of 2011. With reference to the relief sought for in the present Writ Appeals, 'the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board' [erstwhile Slum Clearance Board] filed a status report, which would reveal that the alternate Tenements are provided to the Writ Appellants. The details regarding the allotment of Tenements provided to the appellants are detailed as under:- “12. I submit that following are the persons received the alternate accommodation from the board; S.No. Tenement No Allottee Appeal Case 1) AE-14 Mariappan WP.No.4936 of 2010 2) AE-15 A.Munusamy WP.No.4394 of 2010 3) AE-16 Selvi WP.No.4936 of 2010 4) AE-17 David WP.No.493 of 2010 5) AE-18 Venkatammal WP.No.4936 of 2010 6) AE-19 Ponni WP.No.4395 of 2010 7) AE-20 Michael WP.No.4395 of 2010 8) AE-21 Singaravelu WP.No.4394 of 2010 9) AE-22 Palanisamy WP.No.4394 of 2010 10) AE-23 Nalathambi WP.No.4936 of 2010 11) AE-28 Jayalakshmi WA.No.1936 of 2013 12) AH-58 Ranganathan WA.No.965 of 2013 13) Ah-59 Verramuthu WA.No.963 of 2013 14) AH-60 Jeyalakshmi WP.No.1386 of 2011 15) AH-55 Vijaya WA.No.546 of 2013 16) AH-56 Lalitha WP.No.3200 of 2011 17) AG-40 Amsa WP.No.1381 of 2011 18) AG-41 Muniyammal WA.No.544 of 2013 19) AG-42 Susila WA.No.2881 of 2012 20) AH-47 M.Murugesan WA.No.1825 of 2013 21) AB-2 E.Anitha WA.No.1842 of 2013 The above persons were allotted alternative accommodation in the Perumbakkam Ezhil Nagar scheme. 13. I submit that as stated supra, the board has issued allotment vide Board Proceedings G9/4799/2013 dated 12.12.2014 to the rest, of 50 persons for the alternative accommodation, but till date they have not come forward to receive the same from the Board. 13. I submit that as stated supra, the board has issued allotment vide Board Proceedings G9/4799/2013 dated 12.12.2014 to the rest, of 50 persons for the alternative accommodation, but till date they have not come forward to receive the same from the Board. In compliance of the direction of this Hon'ble Court passed in the writ petition to issue alternative accommodation to the Writ petitioner, the Board has taken necessary steps in order to comply the order of this Hon'ble Court and the same was complied in true spirit and Board has issued alternative accommodation to the respective eligible persons. 14. I submit that, the following are the 50 persons who have not come forward to receive allotment order from the Board and have filed the writ appeal for the alternative accommodation till date and has directed by this Hon'ble Court the Board is ready with the tenements since 12.12.2014.” Board Proceedings No.G9/4799/2013 dated 12.12.2014 S.No. Petitioner/Appellant Details of the Case 1) Sivashanmugam W.A.No.543/2013 2) Haja Mohideen W.A.No.545/2013 3) Vijaya W.A.No.546/2013 4) Kumar W.A.No.966/2013 5) Lakshmi W.A.No.967/2013 6) Johnson W.A.No.1670/2013 7) Perumal W.A.No.1669/2013 8) Sagunthala W.A.No.1672/2013 9) Gomathi W.A.No.964/2013 10) Murugan W.A.No.1699/2013 11) Yasmin W.A.No.1820/2013 12) Sivanandam W.A.No.1871/2013 13) Raj Kumar W.A.No.1837/2013 14) Vanaroja W.A.No.1836/2013 15) Asen W.A.No.1838/2013 16) Shamugam W.A.No.1815/2013 17) Raman W.A.No.1839/2013 18) M.Yasmin W.A.No.1840/2013 19) Naseera Begum W.A.No.1866/2013 20) Sankar W.A.No.1843/2013 21) Dhilsath Begum W.A.No.1867/2013 22) Natarasan W.A.No.1841/2013 23) Stephen W.A.No.1822/2013 24) Karpagam W.A.No.1823/2013 25) Manarsamy W.A.No.1824/2013 26) Inbasekar W.A.No.1826/2013 27) Shamsudeen W.A.No.1827/2013 28) Abdul Khader W.A.No.1829/2013 29) Suresh W.A.No.1828/2013 30) Fazial Hussain W.A.No.1870/2013 31) Babu W.A.No.1816/2013 32) Nabeesath W.A.No.1831/2013 33) Selvakumar W.A.No.1830/2013 34) Meharunnisa W.A.No.1832/2013 35) Yosuf Sheik W.A.No.1863/2013 36) Khaleel Ibrahim W.A.No.1864/2013 37) Saroja W.A.No.1818/2013 38) Sabiya W.A.No.1819/2013 39) Raja Mohammed W.A.No.1817/2013 40) Rahmathunnisa W.A.No.1821/2013 41) Sabiral Beevi W.A.No.1834/2013 42) Rahimath Beevi W.A.No.1862/2013 43) Mohammed Jalal W.A.No.1861/2013 44) Rajendran W.A.No.1833/2013 45) Muthu W.A.No.1860/2013 46) Ganeshan W.A.No.1835/2013 47) Shanmugam W.A.No.1859/2013 48) Mala W.A.No.1865/2013 49) Piranmalai W.A.No.1868/2013 50) Mohammed Raffiq W.A.No.1869/2013 2. The writ appellants, on payment of beneficiary cost, the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board will allot Tenement to the writ appellants by following due process. Therefore, the writ appellants are at liberty to pay the beneficiary cost to the Urban Habitat Development Board and on receipt of payment, the allotment is to be made. In respect of the appellants, who have already been allotted tenement are not entitled to seek any further allotment. 3. Therefore, the writ appellants are at liberty to pay the beneficiary cost to the Urban Habitat Development Board and on receipt of payment, the allotment is to be made. In respect of the appellants, who have already been allotted tenement are not entitled to seek any further allotment. 3. In view of the fact that the Urban Habitat Development Board is providing alternate allotment to all the writ appellants, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken in respect of the grounds raised in the present Writ Appeals. Accordingly, the Writ Appeals stand disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.