Research › Search › Judgment

Andhra High Court · body

2024 DIGILAW 1538 (AP)

M. Venkataram Naik v. Vadithya Sreeram Naik

2024-11-08

NYAPATHY VIJAY

body2024
ORDER : NYAPATHY VIJAY, J. 1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the Order dated 30.06.2022 in C.F. No.563 of 2022 in O.S. No.-- of 2022 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Puttaparthi, Ananthapuram District. 2. The Petitioner is the Plaintiff belonging to Schedule Tribe Community. A suit was filed for recovery of money said to have been given by the Petitioner to the respondent pursuant to an Agreement of Sale dated 10.03.2018 for an amount of Rs. 5,80,000/- said to have been given by the petitioner to the respondent under Agreement of Sale dated 10.03.2018 with regard to the suit schedule property. It is the contention of the Petitioner that though an agreement of sale was executed, the Respondent was evading to execute Registered Sale Deed by postponing the same on some pretext or the other. In that view, the petitioner sought for refund of the sale consideration with interest. As the same was not being paid, the said suit was filed for recovery of the suit amount with costs and future interests. 3. The suit was filed without paying Court Fee and exemption was sought on the ground that the Petitioner belongs to Schedule Tribes Community. The Petitioner relied on G.O. Ms.No.381, dated 20.03.1968, issued in exercise of the power under Section 68 of the Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 (for short ' the Act, 1956'), exempting the members of the Schedule Tribes Community from payment of Court Fee. The trial Court relying on a Judgment of this Court in the case of Kopparthi Krishnamurthy V District Legal Services Authority and Others 2018 (2) ALT 198 rejected the plea of the Petitioner for exemption. Challenging the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. 4. Heard Sri S. Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner, and Sri V. Nitesh, learned counsel for the Respondent. 5. As per the A.P. Court Fee And Suit Valuation Act, 1956, the Government is entitled to exempt certain classes of persons from paying Court Fee under Section 68 of the Act. The Section 68 reads as under; 68. Power to reduce or remit fees. 5. As per the A.P. Court Fee And Suit Valuation Act, 1956, the Government is entitled to exempt certain classes of persons from paying Court Fee under Section 68 of the Act. The Section 68 reads as under; 68. Power to reduce or remit fees. "The State Government may, by notification in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette, reduce or remit, in the whole or in any part of the territory of his State, or any of the fees chargeable under this Act, and may, in like manner, cancel or vary such notification". 6. In exercise of power thereunder, G.O. Ms.No.381 was issued by the Government exempting the members of the Scheduled Tribes from paying the Court Fee. The G.O. Ms No. 381 reads as under; " GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT ANDHRA COURT FEES AND SUITS VALUATION ACT, 1956- Civil Suits/ by Scheduled Tribes - Remission of Court Fees - Notification issued. ---------- HOME (COURTS.A) DEPARTMENT G.O. Ms.No.381 Dated the 20th March, 1968. Read the following: 1. From the Collector, Khammam, R.C. No.D1.1099/65, dt. 3.3.65. 2. From the Inspector General, o/o Registrar & Stamps Letter No.S1.19628/dated 26.03.1966. 3. From the Director of Social Welfare, Rc.No.10793/65.II, Dated 31.03.1965. 4. From the Board of Revenue, L.Dis.2573/Q/65, dt.18.4.1966 5. From the Registrar, High Court, Roc.No.817/66, dt.--.8.1966 ORDER: The following notification will be published in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette:- NOTIFICATION: In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 68 of the Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 (Act VII of 1956), the Governor of Andhra Pradesh hereby remits in the whole of the State of Andhra Pradesh, the fees chargeable under the said Act in respect of Civil Suits - instituted by persons belonging to scheduled tribes. G.M. Ahmed, Joint Secretary to Government" 7. The power to reduce or remit the Court Fee is provided under 68 of the Act. Pursuant thereto, exemption from paying Court Fee in respect of the suit instituted by persons belonging to the Schedule Tribes was issued. Once the state had granted statutory exemption for payment of court fee in exercise of power specifically under the Act to a certain class of persons, the same would prevail till it is rescinded or modified under the Act in exercise of power under Section 68 of the Act. 8. Once the state had granted statutory exemption for payment of court fee in exercise of power specifically under the Act to a certain class of persons, the same would prevail till it is rescinded or modified under the Act in exercise of power under Section 68 of the Act. 8. The trial court reliance on the judgment of this court Kopparthi Krishnamurthy's appears to be misplaced as the G.O. Ms.No.381 did not fall for consideration therein. In that case, the petitioner was an agriculturist and not a member belonging to scheduled tribe community and WP was filed questioning the refusal by the Mandal Legal services to issue court fee exemption certificate. In was in that context, this Hon'ble Court held that there is no general power to issue exemption of court fee to Mandal/District/State legal services authority under the Act. It was held that on application for legal services under section 12, If the concerned Legal Services Authority is satisfied that such a person satisfies the criteria specified in Section 12 of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987, then it may be open to the concerned authority to invoke the stipulations contained in the Government order G.O. Ms. No. 73 Law dated 19.06.2007 issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 68 of the A.P. Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956, subject, however, to the conditions stipulated in the said Government Order. 9. Therefore, this Court is inclined to interfere with the order passed by the trial Court and the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be allowed. 10. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the Order dated 30.06.2022 in C.F. No.563 of 2022 in O.S. No.--- of 2022 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Puttaparthi, Ananthapuram District, is set aside. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous Petition, if any, pending shall stand closed.