K. Gnanavalli v. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Education Department
2024-07-11
C.KUMARAPPAN, S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
body2024
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : (S.M. Subramaniam, J.) (Prayer in WA.No.639/2019: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order of the learned Judge dated 25.11.2016 passed in WP.No.11237 of 2015 and allow the writ appeal and consequently direct the respondents to give the first priority for the dependence of the serving personnel/Ex-Servicemen as mandated in G.O.Ms.No.1161 dated 22.11.1984.) (Prayer in WA.No.640/2019: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order of the learned Judge dated 25.11.2016 passed in WP.No.11238 of 2015 and allow the writ appeal and consequently direct the respondents to give the first priority for the dependence of the serving personnel/Ex-Servicemen as mandated in G.O.Ms.No.1161 dated 22.11.1984.) The writ petitioners are the appellant before us. The writ petitions were instituted to sponsor the name of the petitioners by the Employment Exchange for selection and appointment to the post of Computer Instructor. 2. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent would submit that the writ petitions are rejected through a common order. Mean while the process of selection for the year 2014 had been completed in all respects and selected candidates were appointed as Computer Instructors. The petitioners were not within the zone of consideration and therefore, their cases were not considered. 3. Subsequently, another selection process was conducted in the year 2019 and the said process had also been completed. That being the factum, the issues raised in the writ appeals lost its relevance. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Appeals stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.