JUDGMENT : Hon'ble Sameer Jain, J. 1. Heard Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Nikhil Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant and Dr. S.B.Maurya, learned AGA-I, for the State. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No.260 of 2023, under Sections 420, 406,467,468, 471, 507 and 120B IPC, Police Station Indirapuram, District Ghaziabad with the prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the instant anticipatory bail application on merit and a direction may be given to the court concerned that if applicant appears before it and applies for bail then his bail application shall be disposed of in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022) 10 SCC 51 . 4. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA are not having any objection if any such direction is given to the court concerned. 5. I have heard both the parties and perused the record of the case. 6. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant and the learned AGA, in case applicant appears before the court concerned within two weeks from today and applies for bail in the instant matter, then his bail application shall be disposed off by the court concerned in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The instant anticipatory bail application stands disposed off accordingly. 8. However, it is made clear that no further time shall be given to the applicant.