Latha Bhatt v. Joint Commissioner Chennai, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
2024-08-02
C.KUMARAPPAN, S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
body2024
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : S.M. Subramaniam, J. [PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order of the learned Judge in WP.No.19558 of 2022 dated 10.10.2022 dismissing the same and to allow the said WP.] The learned Senior Counsel Mr. R. Srinivas would submit that the appellant Dr. Latha Bhatt has taken a decision to hand over the vacant possession of the subject property to the Executive Officer, Arulmigu Gangadeeswarar Temple. It is contended that the Temple instituted a Civil Suit for eviction and the same was decreed. The Appeal suit filed against the decree by the appellant herein is pending. The Competent Authorities under Section 78 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act initiated proceedings to evict the encroachers. The appellant was considered as an encroacher under Section 78 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act. Though the learned Senior Counsel would contend that Section 78 proceedings are unnecessary in view of the Civil Court decree, the appellant has decided to hand over vacant possession of the Temple property to the Authority and that being the undertaking given by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant on behalf of the appellant, no further adjudication on merits are required. 2. Accordingly, the appellant is directed to hand over vacant possession of the subject property to the Executive Officer of the Temple, within a period of two(2) weeks from today. Recording the said undertaking, this writ appeal stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected CMPs are also closed.