JUDGMENT : Alok Kumar Verma, J. Present Application has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of Anticipatory Bail under Sections 420, 465, 466, 468, 471, 474, 120 B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 8 and Section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in connection with the First Information Report No.32 of 2017 (Special Sessions Trial No.4 of 2020), registered at police station Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. 2. Heard Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. V.K. Gemini, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Brief Holder for State. 3. Learned counsel for State has opposed the Anticipatory Bail Application orally. 4. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, contended that the applicant, aged about 55 years, has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He was not arrested during the course of the investigation. He is not a previous convict. He is a permanent resident of District, Udham Singh Nagar, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding. Charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. 5. Mr. V.K. Gemini, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State submits that the charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, custodial interrogation of the applicant is not needed. 6. Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, applicant- Dilsher Singh is directed to be released on Anticipatory Bail, in the event of his arrest, on furnishing his personal bond of Rs.30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount on the following conditions:- (i) Applicant shall attend the Trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment; (ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case. (iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Trial Court. 8. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the concerned authority will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. 9. Anticipatory Bail Application (No. 1111 of 2023) stands disposed of accordingly.