JUDGMENT : Deepak Verma, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application moved on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.17 of 2023, under Sections 308, 504, 506/34 I.P.C., P.S. Bisanda, District Banda, during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegation levelled in the F.I.R. is false and concocted. Further submission is that co-accused Ram Naresh has been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.07.2023 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.29184 of 2023. The applicant is languishing in jail since 20.01.2023. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicant and submitted that applicant has been convicted in S.T. No. 129 of 2001, under Section 302 I.P.C. and Section 25 Arms Act. The prosecution witnesses are being examined. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of allegations, gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application of applicant is hereby rejected. 6. However, the trial court is directed to decide the trial of the case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, preferably, within a period of eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment.