Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2024 DIGILAW 2065 (MAD)

V. L. Benin Deva Kumar v. State of Tamil Nadu

2024-08-22

ABDUL QUDDHOSE

body2024
ORDER : Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent related to the seniority list drawn as on 01.01.2019 produced along with the Director's Letter addressed to Special Government Pleader dated 11.12.2020 on 15.12.2020 and quash the same and direct the respondent to notify the seniority list of B.T. Assistant (Promotees) and the directly recruited consolidated pay B.T. Assistant between 2002-2006 and 2011-2014 by following the ratio of 50-50 fixed between the Direct Recruits and the promotees before effecting further promotion to the post of Headmaster / Headmistress or P.G. Assistant. 1. When the Writ Petition was taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioners on instructions would submit that though the petitioners have challenged the impugned seniority list, the petitioners will be satisfied if they are allowed to give a representation to the second respondent to fix the ratio of 50:50 fixed between the direct recruits and the promotees, before effecting further promotion to the post of Head Master / Head Mistress or P.G. Assistants and a direction is issued to the second respondent to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the respective private respondents even though raised objections with regard to the relief sought for by the petitioners, they have not raised any serious objection if the representation of the petitioner is directed to be considered on merits and in accordance with law, after taking into consideration the interest of all the stake holders. 3. Accordingly, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent seeking for a relief as sought for in this writ petition within a period of two [2] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said representation, the second respondent shall pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve [12] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.