Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2024 DIGILAW 217 (UTT)

Jabir v. State of Uttarakhand

2024-03-22

RAVINDRA MAITHANI

body2024
JUDGMENT : (Ravindra Maithani, J.) : Applicant Jabir is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.782 of 2023, dated 17.10.2023, under Sections 376(3) IPC and Sections 3(a)/4 (2) of The Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Jwalapur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, 6-7 days prior to lodging of the FIR, the applicant entered into the house of the informant and inappropriately touched her daughter. When the applicant tired to tear away the clothes of the victim, she cried and the applicant ran away. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that it is a false FIR; she would submit that, in fact, the father-in-law of the informant had sold the house to the applicant; the informant was quite unhappy with it; they were demanding money from the applicant, of which, a report was lodged by the father-in-law of the informant on 25.07.2023. Reference has been made to the Annexure No.8 to the bail application. 5. It is also argued that, in fact, on 07.10.2023, the applicant himself had lodged a report against the informant and his family members for illegally demanding money. Reference has been made to Annexure No.6 to the bail application. 6. In addition to it, it is also argued that the statement of the victim does not, as such support the FIR, it is much wavering. 7. On the last occasion, the Court has required the learned State counsel to get instructions with regard to Annexure Nos.6 and 8. It is stated that according to the Investigating Officer, he did not receive such documents. 8. At it, learned counsel for the applicant would submit that, in fact, Annexure No.6 was received by the police and it bears the seal of the police. 9. It is the stage of bail. Much of the discussion at this stage is to be avoided. To the extent of appreciating the controversy the matter may be examined with the caveat that any observation made at this stage shall have no bearing at any subsequent stage of the case. 10. As per FIR, it is a case of inappropriate touch; the applicant attempted to tear away the clothes of the victim, when she cried the applicant ran away. 10. As per FIR, it is a case of inappropriate touch; the applicant attempted to tear away the clothes of the victim, when she cried the applicant ran away. But, when the victim was medically examined on 31.10.2023, there She levelled more serious allegations in terms of history of the offence, which the victim told to the doctors. In her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the victim has stated about rape. She has stated when the applicant attempted for rape, she cried out of pain and then the applicant ran away. 11. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 12. The bail application is allowed. 13. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.