JUDGMENT : Vikas Budhwar, J. 1. Heard Shri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist and Shri Rajendra Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present revision has been preferred questioning the order dated 28.05.2024 passed in Complaint Case No. 575 of 2019 ( Shiv Murat Vs. Nirmala Devi and others) by the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 15, Prayagraj whereby the exercise of the power under Section 203 Cr.P.C., the complaint case has been rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that on 16.08.2016 a piece of demise land was purchased by the wife of the revisionist from Kalpana Mishra. However, Kalpana Mishra along with Nirmala Devi thereafter executed another sale deed on 14.08.2018 whereby the land which had already been transferred to the wife of the revisionist was included. He submits in para 15 of the stay application appended to the revision, it has been stated that Smt. Kavita, wife of the revisionist has already approached the civil court, Allahabad/Prayagraj by filing an Original Suit No. 427 of 2018 against the private respondent for permanent injunction. 4. Learned A.G.A. on the other hand submits that the matter itself is a purely civil dispute and rightly so the wife of the revisionist has already approached the civil court and the civil suit is pending. He submits that it is the civil court which has jurisdiction to set aside and even cancel the sale deed. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am of the firm opinion that the present dispute is nothing but a pure civil dispute which is being sought to be given a criminal tench. Moreso when, civil suit itself is pending. 6. In view of the above, the present revision stands consigned to record.