ORDER 1. This is a petition seeking review of order dated 9.12.2014 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.23221 of 2014 in Criminal Appeal No.1109 of 2013 whereby the appellant was allowed to withdraw his appeal. 2. It would be relevant to state here that the present petitioner (Gudda @ Shivashankar) was one of the co-accused who had been convicted by the trial Court as also by the High Court along with four other co-accused. 3. Subsequently, it appears that two other coaccused (Shankar and Suresh Dobi) had also assailed the common impugned order of the High Court by way of Criminal Appeal No.1785/2011 and Criminal Appeals No. 1786-1788 of 2011. These appeals were allowed by this Court vide judgment dated 18.4.2018 by setting aside the conviction recorded by the Courts below and acquitting the appellants therein. The said judgment has been filed as Annexure A-3 to the Review Petition. We have perused the same and find that this Court disbelieved the evidence of the witnesses including the first informant and the alleged eyewitnesses. It, accordingly, acquitted the appellants therein. 4. The petitioner seeks benefit of such judgment of acquittal and as such has preferred this review petition. 5. It is also noticed from the judgment of this Court dated 18.4.2018 that this Court found that the very implication of the accused persons was found to be not substantiated. Even if specific roles were given to the accused would not make any difference and once the FIR version itself is found to be unsubstantiated, the petitioner herein would also be entitled to the same benefit. 6. In view of the foregoing and having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we allow this review petition and restore the Criminal Appeal to its original number and extend the same benefit to the appellant herein as has been given to the coaccused in Criminal Appeals No. 1785 of 2011 and 1786-1788 of 2011. 7. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed and the conviction of the appellant is set aside. The appellant shall be released forthwith if he is in custody and not required in any other case.