JUDGMENT : Anu Sivaraman, J. - Heard learned counsel on both sides quite in extenso. We have also referred to the decisions relied upon by learned counsel appearing on both sides. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel on both sides and the provisions of Section 17 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 as also the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, in Celir LLP v. Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. and others 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 808, which is relied upon by learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that the direction in the impugned order to the effect that the issue of limitation shall not be raised before the Debts Recovery Tribunal was not justified. 3. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of vacating the direction that the issue of limitation shall not be raised before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. 4. The Debts Recovery Tribunal shall consider all aspects of the matter including the question of limitation as is raised before it. 5. Certified copy of this judgment shall be issued to the appellant immediately so as to place it before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. All questions are left open to be decided by the Debts Recovery Tribunal. 6. The parties shall appear before the Debts Recovery Tribunal along with certified copy of this judgment on 18.04.2024. 7. Till then, the Debts Recovery Tribunal shall not pass orders in the Securitization Appeal. 8. In view of disposal of main appeal, pending I.As, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of as well.