ORDER : SUNDER MOHAN, J. The revision challenges the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur, under Section 52(1) of the Tamil Nadu Vanniyakula Kshatriya Public Charitable Trusts and Endowments (Protection and Maintenance) Act 2018, directing the petitioner to vacate and hand over the possession of the property measuring 1092 sq.mt., situated in TS.No.50, Block No.21, Ward 27H, Thiruvottiyur, within a period of 15 days to the first respondent/Tamil Nadu Vanniyakula Kshatriya Public Charitable Trusts and Endowments Board. 2. The first respondent Board was established by the Tamil Nadu Vanniyakula Kshatriya Public Charitable Trust and Endowments (Protection and Maintenance) Act, 2018, (hereinafter called the 'Act'). The above Act was enacted to protect and maintain the Public Charitable Trusts and Endowments, which were created and being administered by the persons or organizations of Vanniyakula Kshatriya Community across the State of Tamil Nadu. 3. Claiming that the property is maintained by one of the Trusts, which has been registered with the first respondent Board; and that the petitioner had encroached upon the said land, the first respondent filed a petition under Section 52(1) of the Act. 4. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur, held that the first respondent is entitled to an order of eviction under Section 52(1) of the Act and directed the petitioner to vacate and hand over the possession to the first respondent within fifteen days. The revision challenges the said order. 5. Heard Mr.P.H.Arvindh Pandian, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, as well as Mr.S.Ananthanarayanan, learned Senior Counsel for the first respondent and Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the second respondent. 6(a). Mr.P.H.Arvindh Pandian, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned Judicial Magistrate, ought not to have invoked the provisions of the Act to evict the petitioner since the property in question is not gazetted in terms of Section 5 of the Act; and that the Public Charitable Trust, who claims rights over the property is not registered with the first respondent. (b). The learned Senior Counsel would further submit that the petitioner is the lawful owner of the property and he is in possession of all the documents and hence prayed to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur. 7. (b). The learned Senior Counsel would further submit that the petitioner is the lawful owner of the property and he is in possession of all the documents and hence prayed to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur. 7. Mr.S.Ananthanarayanan, learned Senior Counsel for the first respondent/Tamil Nadu Vanniyakula Kshatriya Public Charitable Trusts and Endowments Board, would submit that the Trust for whom the first respondent filed this petition before the learned Magistrate is in possession of the property from 1874; that the petitioner's father was only a lessee in the said property and the petitioner claimed ownership based on a Settlement Deed executed by his father; that all the documents of title have been cancelled since the Trust is the lawful owner; and that the property is registered with the Board and could not be gazetted for some reasons and therefore, there is no infirmity in the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur; hence he prayed for dismissal of this revision. 8. The only point involved in this revision is whether the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur, was empowered to pass the impugned order under the Act. As stated earlier, the Act was enacted to protect the properties of the Trusts and Endowments that are administered by persons or organizations of the Vanniyakula Kshtraiya Community across the State of Tamil Nadu. The Act therefore has provided for certain special Provisions by which the Chief Administrative Officer can seek eviction by approaching the learned Magistrate instead of filing a Civil Suit. Section 51(1) of the Act empowers the Chief Administrative Officer of the Board to issue a notice to any person if he receives any complaint or, on his own motion comes to know that the said person had encroached upon the property that is gazetted in terms of Section 5 of the Act. If the encroacher fails to vacate in terms of the notice, then the Chief Administrative Officer can apply under Section 52 (2) of the Act to the learned Magistrate for a direction to evict the encroacher. 9. To invoke the said provisions, certain conditions are provided in the Act. One of the conditions is that the property for which the provisions of the Act are invoked must be gazetted in terms of Section 5 of the Act. Section 5 of the Act reads as follows : “ 5 . 9. To invoke the said provisions, certain conditions are provided in the Act. One of the conditions is that the property for which the provisions of the Act are invoked must be gazetted in terms of Section 5 of the Act. Section 5 of the Act reads as follows : “ 5 . The Board shall examine the report submitted to it under sub-section(2) of section 4 and publish in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, a list of properties of each trust and endowment in the State.” 10. Admittedly the property in question has not been gazetted in terms of Section 5 of the Act, though, according to the learned Senior Counsel for the first respondent, they made an attempt to publish the said property in the gazette it could not be done for certain reasons. Since the property has not been gazetted, this Court is of the view that the Chief Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Vanniyakula Kshatriya Public Charitable Trusts and Endowments Board, has no power to invoke the Provisions of Chapter IX of the Act, for removal of encroachment. Hence, the impugned order is liable to be set aside and hence set aside. 11. It is open to both the parties to establish their claim for title over the disputed property in the appropriate forum in accordance with law. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case stands Allowed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.