Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2024 DIGILAW 343 (ALL)

Rakesh @ Rakesh Kumar v. State of U. P.

2024-02-01

DEEPAK VERMA

body2024
JUDGMENT : Deepak Verma, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.280 of 2023, under Section 376(2) N, 506 I.P.C. P.S. Fatehganj West, District Bareilly, during pendency of the trial. 3. As per FIR allegation, marriage between applicant and victim was settled by both families, thereafter, applicant and victim developed physical relationship and after sometime, marriage was not materialized. The victim married to some other person thereafter first information report was lodged. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. From the statement of victim recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. it appears that victim was in consensual relationship with applicant. From the statement of husband and other witnesses, it appears that there is no video or audio evidence as alleged in the F.I.R.. The Investigating Officer has also not recorded any electronic evidence. The applicant has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, there is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future. The applicant is languishing in jail since 26.11.2023 and in case, he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant. 6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant, Rakesh @ Rakesh Kumar, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.