ORDER : Heard. 2. Mr. Sandeep Pathak appears on behalf of respondent No.1. 3. Though, advance copy has already been served in the office of Advocate General, no one appears on an advance copy for and on behalf of respondent Nos.2,3 & 4. 4. The petition requires hearing. 5. Issue notice to respondent Nos.2,3 & 4 on payment of PF and notice within one week, returnable within three weeks. 6. In the meanwhile, taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner that in respect of the same transaction, an ITC claim of the petitioner pertaining to the assessment period July 2017 to March 2019, based on similar set of transactions, already a notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act 2017 has been issued by Central Goods and Services Tax Authorities, subsequent notice by the State Authorities under RGST Act 2017 in respect of the same matter is barred under Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and RGST Act 2017, respondent Nos.2,3 & 4 are restrained from proceedings further pursuant to impugned show cause notice dated 31.01.2024. 7. It is made clear that this interim order shall not come in the way of respondent No.1 or CGST Authorities in proceedings with the notice issued by it to the petitioner earlier on 17.03.2022. 8. List this case along with D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18618/2023. 9. In addition, the Registry to publish the name of Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG, who usually represents the Department of Finance, Government of Rajasthan.